1 Amber Strike - Reed Marcotte
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2015 1:40 am
Hi
I have felt is appropriate to issue Reed with 1 AMBER STRIKE due to the the feedback I gave him in the below thread and his response following a question he posted to the forum:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=657
At first, Reed seems to take on board my feedback and thanked me for providing him with such a response. He then shares that through his Law of Attraction, other people have stated that they feel he was arrogant a number of times in the past. Due to the nature of the injury of arrogance itself, many people with this injury tend to see it as others are inaccurate and have misinterpreted their motivations and condition rather than looking internally as to the reasons why people may be telling them such things about themselves. In Reed's response, you can see he has started opening himself up to this possibility when he stated the following:
This very pattern of behaviour has been perfectly illustrated in Reed's response to me. After initially intellectually entertaining the possibility that he may have the addiction of arrogance, Reed then reverted back to attempting to get this very addiction met in the second half of his response as seen below:
Reed, I must correct your current interpretation of my response to you as I feel due to your current set of injuries, you have taken an inaccurate feeling of confirmation to suit your own current beliefs and have manipulated my response to feed your own addiction of arrogance and wanting to appear knowledgeable to others in a way to hold onto this belief that you know this particular truth for certain (which I still cannot agree with you about due to the reasons I have expressed in this thread and also in my response on the thread itself).
You have likened my experience to your own however I feel they are two completely different experiences underpinned by two different emotional processes. This is not me trying to "shun" you or put you down, it's just my honest observation of the truth of the situation in an attempt to help you see the truth from a logical perspective initially, as this is where the vast majority of your current method of determining truth lies (with the emotional side of the process not being engaged).
I too like Reed (and many others) came across the Divine Love path following a prayer (which is sincere and passionate in nature) to God to be led to the Truth but this does not automatically mean that AJ must be Jesus - this is a completely different matter altogether. I know that when I came across the Divine Truth, I didn't just see AJ talking and knew for certain, in that instant, in my heart that he was Jesus right away and I am sure anyone else who had a similar experience can vouch for me when I state this - Reed even stated this himself in his first post on the thread, yet in his second post in response to me, he contradicts himself and this occurred due to him responding in facade and wanting to get his addiction met.
In an attempt to highlight this further and with more clarity, he stated the following in his response to me:
Also, due to his addictions of arrogance and wanting to appear knowledgable to others, Reed hooked into his friend's request to post the question on this forum. However, there is an ethical issue here for Reed's friend as if his friend truly wanted to know the answer to the question, they would have asked the question themselves rather than manipulating Reed into doing this on their behalf. In his desire to feed his own addictions, Reed missed this and consequently fed the addiction of his friend at the same time.
In Reed's response to me, I feel he is displaying a facade of humility and the underlying emotions I can feel from him are resistance as well as being emotionally dismissive of the feedback I offered him and this is evident in his misinterpretation of my response. I have tried to be as clear as possible in providing a number of examples as to why I feel this is the case as anyone who has the injury of arrogance generally finds it extremely difficult to see this in themselves unless they are either very sincere and humble OR they are presented with a large amount of logical examples and "evidence" to demonstrate that this is actually the truth of the situation.
Thanks
Nicky
I have felt is appropriate to issue Reed with 1 AMBER STRIKE due to the the feedback I gave him in the below thread and his response following a question he posted to the forum:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=657
At first, Reed seems to take on board my feedback and thanked me for providing him with such a response. He then shares that through his Law of Attraction, other people have stated that they feel he was arrogant a number of times in the past. Due to the nature of the injury of arrogance itself, many people with this injury tend to see it as others are inaccurate and have misinterpreted their motivations and condition rather than looking internally as to the reasons why people may be telling them such things about themselves. In Reed's response, you can see he has started opening himself up to this possibility when he stated the following:
In answer to your question Reed, yes I feel that you do have the injury of arrogance currently and it does form quite a large part of your facade. There are very good reasons as to why at present, you are attracting people stating such things to you about your own arrogance but as of yet you have not seriously considered it at a soul level. I feel that at times, you have intellectually entertained the idea when it has come up in your LoA (which is God's messenger of Truth) but then skipped over it soon after and "brushed it under the carpet" without really doing the soul based emotional work required in discovering whether you do indeed have this injury and going through the necessary steps to remove this addiction as how Jesus has taught how this can be achieved.The subject of me being arrogant did come up. So, I guess I should take a good look at my reasons for wanting to post such a thing and do I have an arrogant injury.? I have been accused of being arrogant at times on the topic of divine truth. I have refused to believe so up until now because I felt as though I was simply implying the truth or attempting to discover it and accused falsely.
This very pattern of behaviour has been perfectly illustrated in Reed's response to me. After initially intellectually entertaining the possibility that he may have the addiction of arrogance, Reed then reverted back to attempting to get this very addiction met in the second half of his response as seen below:
I am glad to hear that it is possible to know with certainty that AJ is Jesus of the 1st century. Confirmation is beautiful. Much like your experience in receiving God's Love, I too am basing this truth off of a specific, deep, soul based prayer I projected just a few minutes prior to having discovered AJ. To deny such a truth would be arrogant, I think. Thanks again for sharing your thoughts.
Reed, I must correct your current interpretation of my response to you as I feel due to your current set of injuries, you have taken an inaccurate feeling of confirmation to suit your own current beliefs and have manipulated my response to feed your own addiction of arrogance and wanting to appear knowledgeable to others in a way to hold onto this belief that you know this particular truth for certain (which I still cannot agree with you about due to the reasons I have expressed in this thread and also in my response on the thread itself).
You have likened my experience to your own however I feel they are two completely different experiences underpinned by two different emotional processes. This is not me trying to "shun" you or put you down, it's just my honest observation of the truth of the situation in an attempt to help you see the truth from a logical perspective initially, as this is where the vast majority of your current method of determining truth lies (with the emotional side of the process not being engaged).
I too like Reed (and many others) came across the Divine Love path following a prayer (which is sincere and passionate in nature) to God to be led to the Truth but this does not automatically mean that AJ must be Jesus - this is a completely different matter altogether. I know that when I came across the Divine Truth, I didn't just see AJ talking and knew for certain, in that instant, in my heart that he was Jesus right away and I am sure anyone else who had a similar experience can vouch for me when I state this - Reed even stated this himself in his first post on the thread, yet in his second post in response to me, he contradicts himself and this occurred due to him responding in facade and wanting to get his addiction met.
In an attempt to highlight this further and with more clarity, he stated the following in his response to me:
Firstly, I do not feel it is a display of true humility to create posts on other public forums proclaiming that you "know" Jesus has returned to The Earth in a "second coming" and then debating with others as to how you could be so sure. I feel if you were certain on the truth, you would not even feel the desire to engage in this action and then be drawn into such debates which would inevitably ensue as a result of stating this. When these debates occur, or as I would call it, an intellectual based "battle" it allows Reed to gain these feelings of worth, importance, appearing knowledgeable and superior to others who "do not know" what he is proclaiming. The action to engage in this activity comes from a selfish motivation to RECEIVE these feelings (addictions) rather than GIVING the gift of "sharing truth" with others, which Reed feels he is currently doing.A friend did ask me to post the question in regards to certainty on this forum. However, I did create a post on another public forum of a photo of AJ saying this is Jesus born in the first century and again in the 21st century etc... which was debated as to how I could be so sure.
Also, due to his addictions of arrogance and wanting to appear knowledgable to others, Reed hooked into his friend's request to post the question on this forum. However, there is an ethical issue here for Reed's friend as if his friend truly wanted to know the answer to the question, they would have asked the question themselves rather than manipulating Reed into doing this on their behalf. In his desire to feed his own addictions, Reed missed this and consequently fed the addiction of his friend at the same time.
In Reed's response to me, I feel he is displaying a facade of humility and the underlying emotions I can feel from him are resistance as well as being emotionally dismissive of the feedback I offered him and this is evident in his misinterpretation of my response. I have tried to be as clear as possible in providing a number of examples as to why I feel this is the case as anyone who has the injury of arrogance generally finds it extremely difficult to see this in themselves unless they are either very sincere and humble OR they are presented with a large amount of logical examples and "evidence" to demonstrate that this is actually the truth of the situation.
Thanks
Nicky